Why the approach of Radical Feminism to prostitution is most superior Essay

Why the approach of Radical Feminism to whoredom is virtually superior - Essay ExampleWhile some see no problem with harlotry and push it, others strongly call for the force of law to dispel this horrendous exercise which has grave social repercussions. umteen approaches have been identified by scholars over the years to understand and analyze the issue of prostitution. The terce strike approaches identified by Jaggar in her paper are related to liberalism, radical feminism, and classical Marxism. Each whizz of these approaches is comprehensively explicated and related to prostitution to analyze the merits offered by all three. My argu handst is this essay is that of all three approaches, radical feminism is the most preferable approach to prostitution because I believe that the women who engage in this practice do not engage out of free will, but are forced to do so being victims of oppression. To clarify this argument, I will start by briefly discussing the theme of both t he liberal and Marxist approaches first and then I will scrutinize my preferred approach at length to prove why it is better. I will also include one objection to my state of affairs on this subject. According to the liberal approach as discussed by Jaggar, considering the practice of prostitution illegal or offensive is both a conservative and objectionable ideology. Proponents of this approach argue that prostitution should be decriminalized because victorious legal measures against it would be a clear violation of thousands of womens rights who engage in this practice by full consent. They also claim that any psychological or emotional disadvantages brought by offering familiar services are dwarfed by military personnely benefits in the form of financial assistance ensured by this practise to women. Such liberals consider the defenders of radical feminism arrogant and manipulative who in the name of defending womens rights actually work to make them more disadvantaged. The li beral approach disapproves equating prostitution to sexual detestation of women. This thought is based on the belief that prostitution is not public but private immorality due to which it cannot be considered a concern of criminal law enforcement agencies. Criminal law should only be concerned with the sources of public immorality like pornography which is a far cry from prostitution. This approach stresses that opponents should fulfil the staggering difference between prostitution which is harmless and pornography which can be harmful and not attempt to mingle them. Willingly or consciously selling sexual services is not the variety of body process which infringes on public order and decency, so there should be no penalties for people who are involved in this practice on any level (Jaggar, 1980, pp. 349-50). The Marxist approach is not as simplistic as the liberal approach and has more depth to it. This approach draws conclusions about prostitution by and by analyzing myriad effects produced by it on the society as the social context of any activity is considered critically important here. Marxists agree that prostitution translates into selling sexual services, but they also argue that this activity resembles marriage a lot in which a woman replaces same services which are exchange in prostitution in return for financial support ensured by her husband. In the marriage, a man is willing to provide for the woman on the condition that she acknowledges and fulfills his sexual needs. Same is the case in prostitution in which a woman consents to offer sexual services in exchange for money from the men she attends. However, the difference is that a marriage is a legalized relationship approved by the social norms, while prostitution is not legalized and the women who are a part of this are called many derogatory names by the society. It is claimed by